BRITNEY SPEARS NAKED!<\/b>
\nThat got your attention, didn\u2019t it? Indeed. \u2018Tis true though\u2026if you\u2019ve been living under a rock since Monday night, then you don\u2019t already know that PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) recently announced that pop star Britney Spears has agreed to pose nude for an upcoming PETA advertisement as part of their SAME, stale, LAME \u201cI\u2019d rather go naked than wear fur\u201d<\/i> poster-child style campaign.<\/p>\n
I\u2019m not sure though whether this is supposed to be some ridiculously easy community service-style punishment (rather than an admission of guilt for being STUPID) for her recent September performance. The mention in the above article of PETA\u2019s initial issue with Ms. Spears, provides the reader with a (not surprisingly) sugary-fairy-dust, pleasantly PC aftertaste, rather than a \u2018bitchfest\u2019 feeling to the reader (of COURSE I prefer the latter!). Yes, I\u2019m referring to the past \u201cCatfight\u201d, so to speak, wherein PETA publicy touted Ms. Spears as being cruel to animals by having a caged tiger on stage at the MTV Video Music Awards this fall. I myself am finding it hard to believe that Ms. Spears had not said something personally, on her own behelf to PETA, either in her own defense for the stage act, or to apologize, publicly proclaim her infinite wealth of stupidity (still waiting for that day, ha!), etc. If she really is ALL FOR anti-cruelty, then how could she allow the September show to go on as it did? Her press people<\/i> sent a letter to PETA saying that Ms. Spears future performances will ban using animals while on tour.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s very exciting news,\u201d said PETA mouthpiece Dan Mathews. \u201cWe are really thrilled to have Britney join our new crop of fur-fighters.\u201d This only happened after<\/i> Spears was sent a letter from PETA representatives, begging her to realize that animals shouldn\u2019t be exposed to crowds, loud noises and bright lights because it\u2019s frightening to them. Matthews tells the media, \u201cShe took our message to heart. There\u2019s so many different animal issues, and you can\u2019t expect that everyone is born Ghandi. We think Britney has set a great example of someone who listened to what we had to say and made a change.\u201d Right. Not everyone is a born Ghandi. But at least we all have half a brain to re-think what she did back in September, before it was done. Makes you wonder, doesn\u2019t it. M-hmm.<\/p>\n
P.S. – For all you drooling, undersexed-and-whacking-off losers<\/b> who visited this page because of the headliner, NO, I don\u2019t think she will be exposing her frontal naked self, it\u2019s probably just her back. Go back to the porn sites.<\/p>\n
Oh, and uh, Britney idolizers\u2026don\u2019t hold your collective breaths. Bring on the hatemail. I love it. Better yet, link to this article on your pink, teen-angsty, \u201cI-love-Fred-Durst-and-hate-this-boy-in-homeroom-that-I-have-a-crush-on-by-golly-and-my-parents-just-don\u2019t-get-anything-my-life-sucks\u201d web site, and rant away. You\u2019re sooo cute when you get mad.<\/p>\n
\nOther posts on this day:<\/p>\n
BRITNEY SPEARS NAKED! That got your attention, didn\u2019t it? Indeed. \u2018Tis true though\u2026if you\u2019ve been living under a rock since Monday night, then you don\u2019t already know that PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) recently announced that pop star Britney Spears has agreed to pose nude for an upcoming PETA advertisement as part … <\/p>\n